News Trending

The head of the World Health Organization stated in his clearest remarks to yet that the UN body remains dedicated to learning how the virus originated that learning the origins of COVID-19 is a moral necessity and all possibilities must be studied.

The Wall Street Journal stated that a US agency determined that the pandemic was most likely brought on by an unintentional Chinese laboratory leak, putting additional pressure on the WHO to provide an explanation. Beijing contests the analysis.

“Understanding #COVID19’s origins and exploring all hypotheses remains: a scientific imperative, to help us prevent future outbreaks (and) a moral imperative, for the sake of the millions of people who died and those who live with #LongCOVID,” said Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Twitter.

He was writing to commemorate three years since the WHO used the term “pandemic” for the first time to describe the widespread COVID-19 epidemic.

The focus of the anniversary, according to activists, lawmakers, and academics, should be on averting a repetition of the unequal COVID-19 vaccine introduction, which they claim resulted in at least 1.3 million avoidable deaths.

After spending weeks in and around Wuhan, China, the site of the first human cases, a WHO-led team concluded in 2021 that the virus had likely been spread from bats to humans via another animal, though more investigation was required. China has said no additional visits are needed.

Since then, the WHO has established a scientific advisory group on dangerous pathogens, but it hasn’t made any determinations regarding how the pandemic started because it claims that important pieces of information are lacking.

Picture Courtesy: Google/images are subject to copyright

Health News

The World Health Organisation has predicted that the present Covid-19 crisis will be over in the timeframe of two years.

The organisation has cited the Spanish Flu experience as the justification for its argument about the crisis.

It has explained about the ability of technology to bring down the impact of the present crisis to the half of its actual potential.

Spanish Flu is not very different from Covid-19. It is a disease outbreak which brought havoc to the world during the 1910s – like the one who has been brought by the present disease crisis.

It took at least two years for the world to recover from the crisis.

During the said period, the world was not advanced in terms of technology.

The latest statement of the WHO is a comparison between the present crisis and the one the earth experienced during the Spanish Flu period.

What makes the comparison disturbing is the fact that unlike the Spanish Flu period at present the world is highly connected.

The Spanish Flue crisis clamed as many as 50 million lives across the world.

The present Covid-19 crisis has killed not less than 800,000 people and left more than 23 million people injured.

Photo Courtesy: Google/ images are subject to copyright 

News

The European country of Sweden – which has taken an entirely different route to address the Covid-19 crisis – has contradicted a warning given by the World Health Organisation on the issue of Covid-19.

Swedish state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell has rejected to move made by the global organisation to include Sweden among countries in Europe at risk of a Covid-19 resurgence.

As per the opinion of the Swedish epidemiologist, what has led the WHO to this conclusion was a misinterpretation of the data.  

He has said that the recent rise in the total number of cases of Covid-19 in the country is the result of the increase in testing.

However, the WHO it seems is not convinced by the way the European country of Sweden has approached the crisis.

What the warning implies that the WHO expects a rise in the number of cases of Covid-19 in Sweden in the coming days.

Photo Courtesy: Google/ images are subject to copyright