featured News Trending

German city bans ‘silent fox’ gesture in schools over far-right link

By 172 0

A northern German city has become the first to ban a classroom hand gesture, commonly used to encourage silence, due to its similarity to a far-right Turkish salute.

The “silent fox” gesture, where the hand mimics an animal with upright ears and a closed mouth, has been a popular teaching tool in Germany and elsewhere to signal children to be quiet. However, authorities in Bremen argue that it closely resembles the extremist “wolf salute,” used by the right-wing Grey Wolves group, making it potentially confusing and politically charged.

This issue gained prominence after Turkish footballer Merih Demiral used the salute during the Euros, leading to a diplomatic dispute and his subsequent ban by Uefa. Interior Minister Nancy Faeser condemned the use of the symbol, calling it an unacceptable platform for racism.

Following the incident, Turkish fans protested the ban, and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan defended Demiral, suggesting the ban was politically motivated. Germany, with its significant Turkish population, felt the tension deeply.

Patricia Brandt, spokesperson for Bremen’s education authority, stated that the city had no choice but to ban the gesture, as its political implications were incompatible with Bremen’s values. She also noted that many educators found the gesture outdated and too authoritative.

The Grey Wolves, a nationalist and Islamist extremist group, is associated with terrorism and hatred towards various ethnic and religious groups. Despite its controversial nature, the silent fox gesture is still used globally under different names like the whispering fox or the quiet coyote in the US.

The ban in Bremen reflects a broader debate in Germany about sensitivity in teaching methods, with some schools now opting for alternative ways to signal silence, such as gongs or different hand signals.

Picture Courtesy: Google/images are subject to copyright

News Trending

Row erupts over German football team switching supplier from Adidas to Nike

By 220 0

The decision by the German Football Association (DFB) to change the supplier of the national team’s kit from Adidas to Nike starting in 2027 has sparked strong reactions from German politicians. Economy Minister Robert Habeck and Health Minister Karl Lauterbach both voiced their disapproval, with Habeck expressing a desire for more local patriotism and Lauterbach labeling the move as “wrong”. The long-standing partnership between Adidas and the German national team, spanning over 70 years, has been a significant part of the country’s football culture.

The DFB defended its decision, emphasizing the financial benefits and support for grassroots football in Germany that the new partnership with Nike would bring. Despite understanding the emotional attachment to the Adidas brand, the DFB stated that economic considerations necessitated the switch. Nike’s substantially higher financial offer, reported to be around €100 million annually compared to Adidas’s €50 million, played a significant role in the decision-making process.

The controversy surrounding the change in kit supplier highlights the intersection of sports, tradition, and commerce. Politicians from across the political spectrum in Germany have expressed concerns about departing from a longstanding partnership that is deeply intertwined with the national team’s identity. As the DFB navigates this transition, it faces the challenge of balancing financial imperatives with the preservation of cultural and sporting heritage.

Picture Courtesy: Google/images are subject to copyright

News Trending

Polish Politics Grappling with ‘Ukraine Fatigue’ Concerns

By 258 0

Since the outset of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Poland has been a staunch supporter of Kyiv, providing military aid and making a passionate case for this support as crucial to Poland’s own defense against Russian aggression. However, there has been a notable shift in the Polish government’s stance on Ukraine.

Recently, a change in tone has emerged, raising questions about Poland’s commitment to Kyiv. Some Polish officials have suggested that Ukraine should show more gratitude for Poland’s support. Poland’s prime minister even hinted at the possibility of ending weapons transfers to Ukraine, though others in his party tried to backtrack on that message.

Polish President Andrzej Duda made a particularly controversial statement, likening Ukraine to a drowning man who could potentially pull down his rescuers. Moscow seized upon these remarks with enthusiasm.

The downturn in relations between the two neighboring countries began over a dispute about grain imports that remains unresolved. Ukraine needs to export its harvest, and land routes are vital since Russia has been deliberately targeting ports on the Black Sea and the Danube River. However, Poland, in a bid to protect its own farmers, has restricted cheaper Ukrainian grain from entering its domestic market, only permitting it to transit to the rest of the European Union.

This shift in Poland’s stance is not occurring in isolation, as “Ukraine fatigue” is looming over election campaigns in various countries. Poland’s governing Law and Justice party (PiS), which is leading in the polls but faces tight margins, is positioning itself as the defender of Polish interests. PiS aims to attract conservative voters who may be sympathetic to the idea that Ukraine is not showing enough gratitude for Polish support.

Despite criticism from opposition politicians who label this shift as dangerous nationalism, Poland’s changing tone reflects a broader trend. Ukraine is concerned about maintaining strong Western support as it faces Russian forces, making this shift in Poland’s stance a cause for worry. However, Poland emphasizes that international aid will continue to reach Ukraine’s frontlines through Rzeszow in the east, a critical transit hub for military supplies. Talks between Ukraine and Poland regarding the grain dispute are ongoing.

Picture Courtesy: Google/images are subject to copyright