featured News Trending

A Swiss court has agreed to admit a landmark climate lawsuit filed by residents of an Indonesian island against cement giant Holcim, marking a first for such litigation in Switzerland. The cantonal court in Zug said it would examine the complaint, which alleges that Holcim’s carbon emissions contribute to global warming and rising sea levels that have repeatedly flooded Pulau Pari, a low-lying island in Indonesia. The case was filed in January 2023 by four island residents, though the court noted the decision could still be overturned during appeal proceedings.

Holcim has said it plans to appeal the ruling, arguing that decisions on carbon emissions should be made by lawmakers rather than civil courts. The company reiterated its commitment to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 and said it has already cut its direct CO₂ emissions by more than 50% since 2015. However, NGOs backing the plaintiffs said Holcim was chosen because it is one of the world’s major carbon emitters and a leading “carbon major” in Switzerland.

Supporters of the case, including Swiss Church Aid, said the ruling represents the first time a Swiss court has admitted climate litigation against a large corporation. The plaintiffs are seeking compensation for climate-related damage, financial support for flood protection measures, and faster reductions in emissions. With cement production responsible for around 7% of global CO₂ emissions, the case is being closely watched as a potential precedent for corporate climate accountability.

Pic courtesy: google/ images are subject to copyright

News Trending

A group of elderly Swiss women have achieved a significant victory in the European Court of Human Rights, marking the first climate case success in the court’s history. These women, primarily in their 70s, emphasized their vulnerability to the impacts of heatwaves associated with climate change due to their age and gender.

The court criticized Switzerland for its insufficient efforts in meeting emission reduction goals, deeming them inadequate. This ruling holds significance as it’s the first time the court has addressed the issue of global warming.

Greta Thunberg, the Swedish activist, joined in the celebration with other activists at the court in Strasbourg. One of the leaders of the Swiss women, Rosemarie Wydler-Walti, expressed disbelief at the victory, highlighting its magnitude.

The court’s decision carries legal weight and could potentially influence legislation in 46 European countries, including the UK. It found Switzerland in breach of its duties under the Convention concerning climate change, noting deficiencies in the country’s climate policies, such as failure to quantify reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

The group of Swiss women, known as KlimaSeniorinnen or Senior Women for Climate Protection, argued that they faced health risks during heatwaves in Switzerland and were unable to leave their homes. Data showed that March of the same year marked the world’s warmest, continuing a trend of record-breaking temperatures.

However, the court dismissed similar cases brought by Portuguese youths and a former French mayor, who also claimed that European governments were not acting swiftly enough to address climate change, thus violating their rights.

Elisabeth Smart, a member of KlimaSeniorinnen at 76 years old, highlighted her lifelong observations of climate change in Switzerland, having grown up on a farm. Despite the nine-year commitment to the case, she emphasized the innate drive within some individuals to take action rather than remain passive.

While governments worldwide have committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions significantly, experts and activists warn that progress remains slow, jeopardizing efforts to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C.

Picture Courtesy: Google/images are subject to copyright